Contemptuous Approach of DC Office Jammu towards Transparency

 

PIO not only Violates RTI Act, but also Ignores  Order of his Senior

Jammu, 13/Jan/2021: Showing utter disregard for the transparency,  the Right to Information Act, the Public Information Officer there in the office of Deputy Commissioner not only violated the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 but he also defied the order issued by his own senior.

Contrary to the tall claims of Jammu & Kashmir Union Territory government about good governance & ensuing transparency in the public administration, the bureaucracy here is hell bent to strangulate the rights of the citizens & defy the law with impunity. 

Sharing the details about his case, RTI Activist Raman Sharma has informed  that the Public Information Officer there in the   office of Deputy Commissioner not only rejected his Right to Information Application dated 27/Aug/2020  that reached the his office on 09/September/2020 but also later refused to even honour the directions issued by his senior officer, the 1^st Appellate Authority of the DC Office Jammu.

Sharma informed that after having failed to receive information on his RTI Application within stipulated period of time i.e.  30 days from the said Public Information Officer there in the office of DC Jammu, he had filed a first appeal under section 19 of the RTI Act before the Additional District Development Commissioner on 30^th  October of 2020 that reached there before the 1^st Appellate Authority on  04/Nov/2020 who issued different notices of appearances  to the Public Information Officer but none was responded. Finally on 14/Dec/2020 Ramesh Chander , KAS (ADDC)  passed a final order & directed the Public Information Officer, Additional Deputy Commissioner(LO) to provide information to the appellant Raman Sharma within 15 Days but shockingly even this order of the Appellate Authority failed to make the reluctant PIO to respond to the RTI application of the information seeker & even as on date the RTI application remain unattended & no information is provided.  

The activist is now contemplating to file 2^nd appeal before the Central Information Commission against the erring PIO.

APPEAL BELOW 

ORDER OF 1ST APPELLATE AUTHORITY